Satellite & TV Information



LifeHealthInsurance.ca

The Potential Conundrum of Regulating Pay-TV


In last week's column, I argued the merits (or rather the lack thereof) of extending decency regulations to cable and satellite TV. This week, I'll point out just how much of a quagmire this would actually be and how difficult it would be to implement, regardless of the merits.

Regulating cable and satellite TV would not be as clear-cut as it might seem on the surface. Remember, we are talking about the regulation of indecency which, unlike obscenity, is protected by the First Amendment. The complexities of such an undertaking are quite formidable, to say the least. There are several key issues that would have to be dealt with and overcome. Like they say, the devil is in the details.

For one thing, Congress would need to determine the scope of what is to be regulated. Would it be cable and satellite TV only or all forms of pay-TV?

If Congress sets out to regulate all forms of pay-TV, the term - "pay-TV" - would have to be legally defined. Besides satellite and cable, would it also include the new IPTV technology in which TV channels, programs, and movies are delivered to TV set-top boxes from the internet? Would internet video viewed on a computer also be included? Or would everything originating from the internet be automatically exempt?

Would wireless pay TV services also be included?

Would videos, whether rented or purchased, also be defined as a form of pay-TV? One could make a case for them being included because videos, both VHS and DVD, are ultimately played on a TV.

What about video delivered by cell phone? Couldn't that also be considered a form of pay-TV?

Now, if Congress decides that the new regulations will only apply to cable and satellite TV, there are still problems. Would all channels on every cable and satellite TV system be regulated or would the regulations just apply to the so-called "basic" channels. Would the term, "all channels", include pay-per-view and video-on-demand (VOD) programs and movies? If so, how would the safe-harbor hours be enforced with VOD, since the subscriber determines when the programs and movies play?

If only the basics are to be included, some definition would be have to be devised to determine the difference between a basic and a premium channel. Would any channel that could be purchased as part of a package of channels be defined as a basic channel? If so, then most channels we currently think of as premiums would be included because they can be packaged together with similar channels. For example, HBO is sometimes packaged with channels like Cinemax, Showtime, Starz, or even other multiplexes of HBO.

Or would basics be limited those channels available in the first tier or two? Since this packaging varies from one cable and satellite system to the next, how would anyone know which channels are the real basics? Would premiums be limited to channels that could be subscribed to individually at an additional price? If that's the case, would a multiplex channel like HBO Signature will treated like a basic, since it cannot be subscribed to individually? Also, the channels that one can subscribe to individually vary slightly from one cable and satellite system to the next, so how would anyone know which channels are the real premiums? When things like that differ from one cable and satellite system to another, would the rules be based on how the majority of the systems operate? Or would some other method be used to resolve this matter?

Perhaps the presence or absence of commercials could be used to separate the basics from the premiums. Under that system, all channels that are advertiser-supported would be considered basics and those that are not would be considered premiums. However, there are potential problems with this methodology as well. Congress would have to come up with a definition for advertiser-supported. Would it be based on the amount of advertising a channel carries? If so, how much advertising would it have to carry to be legally considered advertiser-supported? Or perhaps it would be based on the amount of revenue a channel derives from advertising. If so, what would that threshold be?

Even the term, "advertising", would have to be legally defined. Would product placement found in movies and TV shows be included in the advertising equation? What about promos run for shows on related channels? Would those count as ads?

Even when all of that is sorted out, this methodology still leaves us with the problem presented by channels like Turner Classic Movies, Fox Movie Channel, and the Independent Film Channel, which don't carry commercials but are included in many basic packages.

Now, assuming that all of the issues surrounding the scope of the new regulations could be worked out, the penalty issues would then have to be resolved. Who would pay the fines? Channel owners? Cable and satellite operators? Performers? All of them?

If internet audio and video are included in the scope of the regulations, would internet service providers and/or IPTV operators also have to pay?

If cable and satellite operators have to pay, couldn't large fines potentially limit some smaller cable companies' ability to expand and implement new technology like high-definition channels?

Then there's the issue of license revocation. Cable and satellite channels don't have licenses like broadcast channels. How could a habitual offender's license be revoked if it doesn't have license to begin with? Or would it just be put out of business? But wouldn't that limit the channel choices available to cable and satellite customers?

Could cable and satellite operators be put out of business? Wouldn't that leave people in some areas with no cable franchise? Wouldn't it squash competition for cable service in areas that currently have it? Would the FCC actually shut down Directv and/or Dish Network and render thousands of backyard dishes worthless?

As you can see, there is a mountain of complicated questions that would have to be answered before the decency regulation of pay-TV could become a reality. Obviously, there would be lots of i's to dot and t's to cross. As this legislation is being considered, lawyers throughout the Capital area are already licking their chops!

Terry Mitchell is a software engineer, freelance writer, and trivia buff from Hopewell, VA. He also serves as a political columnist for American Daily and operates his own website - http://www.commenterry.com - on which he posts commentaries on various subjects such as politics, technology, religion, health and well-being, personal finance, and sports. His commentaries offer a unique point of view that is not often found in mainstream media.


MORE RESOURCES:

Google Satellite TV Search to Be Fueled by Android
eWeek
Google and the Dish Network are implementing Google's Web search experience through a Google Android set-top box. Users' search queries bring back both TV ...

and more »



Reuters

Yemen seizes Arab satellite TV gear over southern unrest
AFP
SANAA — Yemeni authorities have seized the transmission gear of Arab satellite news channels over their coverage of deadly unrest in the south of the ...
Yemeni authorities confiscates transmitter of al-Jazeera TVPeople's Daily Online

all 273 news articles »


M'sian tycoon mounts big buyout of satellite TV firm
Business Times (subscription)
By S JAYASANKARAN IN one of the year's largest corporate transactions, Astro Holdings, a special-purpose vehicle controlled by tycoon T Ananda Krishnan, ...

and more »


Christian Science Monitor

NCAA March Madness On Demand sets streaming video record
Christian Science Monitor
... Judiciary Committee's antitrust panel, for its policy of limiting online Olympics video access to those who pay for cable or satellite TV subscriptions. ...

and more »


Mobile Satellite TV - A Global Strategic Business Report - New Market Report ...
OfficialWire (press release)
by Press Office This 384 page report analyzes the worldwide markets for Mobile Satellite TV in US$ Million. The report provides separate comprehensive ...
Research and Markets: Mobile Satellite TV - Global Strategic Business ReportFOXBusiness

all 64 news articles »


Reportlinker — Mobile Satellite TV Examined (SatBroadcasting™)
SatNews Publishers
Reportlinker.com has a new market research report is available in its catalogue — Global Mobile Satellite TV Industry. The report may be garnered at this ...
Reportlinker Adds Global Mobile Satellite TV IndustryIT News Online
Reportlinker Adds Global Mobile Satellite TV IndustryDigital Producer (press release)

all 14 news articles »


Reuters

MidEast Daily News
The Media Line
“We can say the war is over,” Saleh was quoted as saying in Al-Arabiya, a large satellite TV station based in the Middle East. Saleh said that the February ...
Gaza crash injures journalist covering Ban visitMa'an News Agency

all 1,550 news articles »


Mashable (blog)

Google Launching Satellite TV Search, Reports Suggest
Infopackets (blog)
Google is rumored to be testing a search tool for Dish Network-powered televisions. It would allow users to search both for programming on the satellite ...
Google dabbles in TV searchITWeb
Google And Dish Network Testing TV Search ServicePSFK
Google Testing TV Internet SearchInformationWeek
AccuraCast
all 84 news articles »


The Hindu

Google Bringing The Web To TV?
MediaPost Publications
Last week, The Wall Street Journal reported that Google was quietly testing a TV search service in partnership with satellite TV provider Dish Network. ...
Google, Sony, Intel Reportedly Team Up To Develop 'Google TV' - UpdateRTT News
Google Pushes TV InitiativeWall Street Journal
Google Working With Intel, Sony, Logitech On TV Search ServiceBarron's (blog)
White Hat News -FierceIPTV -ABH News
all 529 news articles »

Google News

home | site map
© 2006